Bug 659288 - kernel: additional stack guard patches [rhel-5.3.z]
Summary: kernel: additional stack guard patches [rhel-5.3.z]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 5.6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jiri Pirko
QA Contact: Hangbin Liu
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 630563
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-12-02 12:38 UTC by RHEL Program Management
Modified: 2015-05-05 01:22 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: kernel-2.6.18-128.29.1.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
An additional patch has been applied to add a guard page for stacks that grow upwards.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-13 08:19:24 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0140 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE kernel bug fix update 2011-01-13 08:18:56 UTC

Description RHEL Program Management 2010-12-02 12:38:20 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #630563 and has been proposed
to be backported to 5.3 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 3 Jiri Pirko 2010-12-20 18:49:38 UTC 
in kernel-2.6.18-128.29.1.el5

linux-2.6-mm-add-guard-page-for-stacks-that-grow-upwards.patch
Comment 6 Jaromir Hradilek 2011-01-12 14:44:32 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
An additional patch has been applied to add a guard page for stacks that grow upwards.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-13 08:19:24 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0140.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.