RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

This bug has been copied from bug #645882 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.0 z-stream (EUS).

in 2.6.32-71.12.1.el6

Hi Andrius, could you please ask the partner to test this to ensure the quality, the kernel are available:

http://people.redhat.com/kzhang/kernel-firmware-2.6.32-71.13.1.el6.noarch.rpm
http://people.redhat.com/kzhang/kernel-2.6.32-71.13.1.el6.i686.rpm
http://people.redhat.com/kzhang/kernel-2.6.32-71.13.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
http://people.redhat.com/kzhang/kernel-2.6.32-71.13.1.el6.ppc64.rpm
http://people.redhat.com/kzhang/kernel-2.6.32-71.13.1.el6.s390x.rpm

(In reply to comment #5)
> Hi Andrius, could you please ask the partner to test this to ensure the
> quality, the kernel are available:
> 
> http://people.redhat.com/kzhang/kernel-firmware-2.6.32-71.13.1.el6.noarch.rpm
> http://people.redhat.com/kzhang/kernel-2.6.32-71.13.1.el6.i686.rpm
> http://people.redhat.com/kzhang/kernel-2.6.32-71.13.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> http://people.redhat.com/kzhang/kernel-2.6.32-71.13.1.el6.ppc64.rpm
> http://people.redhat.com/kzhang/kernel-2.6.32-71.13.1.el6.s390x.rpm

Andrius is no longer performing this role at Red Hat.

Can netapp help out here?

Thanks, Rob

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0007.html

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Updated partner qualification injecting target faults uncovered a flaw where the Emulex lpfc driver would incorrectly panic due to a null pnode dereference. This update addresses the issue and was tested successfully under the same test conditions without the panic occurring.