Bug 66094 – RH7.2 bind update compares as older than RH7.1 bind update

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 66094 - RH7.2 bind update compares as older than RH7.1 bind update

Summary:	RH7.2 bind update compares as older than RH7.1 bind update

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	bind (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.2
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Daniel Walsh
QA Contact:	Ben Levenson
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2002-06-04 22:33 EDT by Chris Jaeger
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:42 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-01-06 14:18:04 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Chris Jaeger 2002-06-04 22:33:21 EDT

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)

Description of problem:
The bind-9.2.1-0.7x update for RedHat 7.2 and 7.3 compares as an older
RPM against the bind-9.2.1-0.70 update for RedHat 7.1, thus making it
impossible to cleanly upgrade from an updated RedHat 7.1 system to an
updated RedHat 7.2 system.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Update bind to the latest RedHat-released version on RedHat 7.1
2. Attempt to upgrade to the latest RedHat-released version of bind for RedHat
7.2 (use --nodeps to get around dependency errors)


Actual Results:  package bind-9.2.1-0.70 (which is newer than bind-9.2.1-0.7x)
is already installed

Expected Results:  should have upgraded fine

Additional info:

Comment 1 Daniel Walsh 2003-01-06 14:18:04 EST

Not a problem in the current version of the software.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.