Description of problem: Xfstest 222 and all following failed on: _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/loop0 is inconsistent Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kernel 2.6.18-235.el5 How reproducible: unknown Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run xfstests test suite. Probably start from 222 or run just 222 is enought. Actual results: _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/loop0 is inconsistent (c) (see 222.full) Expected results: All tests passed. Additional info: https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/recipes/74209
Will probably require backprting these commits from upstream to fix: 1817176a86352f65210139d4c794ad2d19fc6b63 xfs: prevent swapext from operating on write-only files dd77ef924c835c9813c3f4dc7e9c72e9cd88d238 xfs: more swap extent fixes for dynamic fork offsets 6bded0f383fd7971b76ad6c194dda7d5b814b871 xfs: clean up inconsistent variable naming in xfs_swap_extent 3a85cd96d3ab3c6dcf88b81fc6eaddb84e565a43 xfs: add tracing to xfs_swap_extents e09f98606dcc156de1146c209d45a0d6d5f51c3f xfs: xfs_swap_extents needs to handle dynamic fork offsets Given the fact this test (in conjunction with 227) was designed to expose a filesystem corruption bug cause by xfs_fsr, we probably should be fixing it in the RHEL5 series.
Dave, sounds like it is worth starting the backport to rhel5. thanks
Fixes posted on 16/12/10.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.
in kernel-2.6.18-245.el5 You can download this test kernel (or newer) from http://people.redhat.com/jwilson/el5 Detailed testing feedback is always welcomed.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1065.html