Bug 665001
| Summary: | Unable to change password | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] freeIPA | Reporter: | Gabor Szathmari <gabor.szathmari> |
| Component: | ipa-server | Assignee: | Rob Crittenden <rcritten> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 1.2 | CC: | benl, dpal, jgalipea, sgallagh |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-02-23 19:55:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Gabor Szathmari
2010-12-22 12:39:06 UTC
RH Enterprise IPA 1.0 works fine It works fine on what, Fedora 14? This looks like a duplicate of 658832 I apologize for the wording in the previous comment. The RH Enterprise IPA (from the CentOS testing repo) is working fine on CentOS 5.5 Which version of 389-ds-base? 389-ds-base-1.2.7.5-1.fc14.i686 The have found out that the problem persists on the client side. In case of using ipa-client on Fedora 14, I can not change the password. However, CentOS 5.5 configured by authconfig-tui (and no ipa-client) just works fine. The have = I have Gabor, can you please do the following: 1) Add "debug_level = 9" to the [domain/<DOMAIN>] section of /etc/sssd/sssd.conf 2) Attempt to change the password. 3) Attach the following log files (sanitized) to this ticket: a. /var/log/secure b. /var/log/sssd/sssd_<DOMAIN>.log c. /var/log/sssd/krb5_child.log Substitute <DOMAIN> with whatever domain is specified in your sssd.conf The Fedora Client is not using sssd at all. Sorry, I misunderstood the problem. Yeah, I agree with Rob's comment above that this is probably a duplicate of Bug #658832 This should have been fixed by the underlaying DS errata. Marking closed. Feel free to reopen if you still observe the problem. |