Bug 66622 - Some VFolder states don't update until you restart
Summary: Some VFolder states don't update until you restart
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: evolution
Version: 7.3
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeremy Katz
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-06-12 17:59 UTC by James Antill
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:38 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-06-12 18:28:09 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description James Antill 2002-06-12 17:59:07 UTC
Description of Problem:
If you create a VFolder on the status of messages (Ie. read/deleted) then when
the state of messages changes so that they should _leave_ the folder they don't
leave the folder until you restart evolution.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

evolution-1.0.3-6

How Reproducible:

Always.

Steps to Reproduce:

Create VFolder for messages that are _all_ of...

1. Read
2. Not deleted.
3. No replied to.


Actual Results:

as you read messages they appear in the VFolder, but as you delete/move/reply to
them they don't leave.


Expected Results:

 They should leave the folder again.

Additional Information:

 If you restart evolution, they will no longer be in the folder (presumably
because they don't enter it this time).
 This was all tested with an INBOX over IMAP.

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2002-06-12 18:18:20 UTC
This is nominally the expected behavior... otherwise, you'd select to read a
message and it would disappear from the vfolder as you were reading it.

Comment 2 James Antill 2002-06-12 18:28:03 UTC
 Ok, I can understand why you wouldn't want them to disappear in real time (the
same UI problem occurs if you turn on hide deleted and delete messages as you
are reading a thread ... it's basically unusable).
 However it shouldn't still be there if I view another folder and then go back,
IMO. Maybe mark it as an RFE then.


Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2002-06-12 18:38:12 UTC
That's the stated opinion from a thread a few months ago on the evolution lists
from upstream.  I'm not forking evolution, but feel free to file something in
their bugzilla (http://bugzilla.ximian.com) if you feel strongly about it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.