Bug 66788 - anaconda 7.3 too sensible
anaconda 7.3 too sensible
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
7.3
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeremy Katz
Brock Organ
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2002-06-16 16:06 EDT by Need Real Name
Modified: 2008-03-06 14:57 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 13:49:06 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Need Real Name 2002-06-16 16:06:16 EDT
Description of Problem:
I tried to install 7.3 it on a new partition on my PC.
Anaconda signals a partition
table problem and refuses to go on , while I can install
 7.1, Mandrake 8.2, Suse 8.0, and Debian 3.0
on that partition, without any trouble.
Is there a big gap between 7.1 and 7.3 within the installation
scripts that make it too sensible ?

My workaround (only for me) would be to build my own ISO iamge, 
with a former verison of anaconda, and the 7.3 packages...

Lets see...


Our latest response:
Re: bugzilla
Dear Sir,
You can also send this issue to bugzilla (this looks like a bug):
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
This way our developer and the open source community can take a look for the
things that gone wrong.
Regards,
Franklin Abud

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How Reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Insert CD1 in my PC
2. choose hda
3. 

Actual Results:
Blockin PB. I installed Suse 8.

Expected Results:
Wanted RH 7.3


Additional Information:
Comment 1 Michael Fulbright 2002-06-17 12:26:31 EDT
We are now using the parted partitioning library that has more tests to see if a
partitioning scheme is intact.

If you could send us a listing of the partitions on your system we might be able
to see if there is a problem with parted.
Comment 2 Michael Fulbright 2002-07-15 12:50:40 EDT
Closing due to inactivity, please reopen if you have additional information.
Comment 3 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 13:49:06 EST
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.