Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 66788 - anaconda 7.3 too sensible
anaconda 7.3 too sensible
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
7.3
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeremy Katz
Brock Organ
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2002-06-16 16:06 EDT by Need Real Name
Modified: 2008-03-06 14:57 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 13:49:06 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Need Real Name 2002-06-16 16:06:16 EDT 
Description of Problem:
I tried to install 7.3 it on a new partition on my PC.
Anaconda signals a partition
table problem and refuses to go on , while I can install
 7.1, Mandrake 8.2, Suse 8.0, and Debian 3.0
on that partition, without any trouble.
Is there a big gap between 7.1 and 7.3 within the installation
scripts that make it too sensible ?

My workaround (only for me) would be to build my own ISO iamge, 
with a former verison of anaconda, and the 7.3 packages...

Lets see...


Our latest response:
Re: bugzilla
Dear Sir,
You can also send this issue to bugzilla (this looks like a bug):
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
This way our developer and the open source community can take a look for the
things that gone wrong.
Regards,
Franklin Abud

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How Reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Insert CD1 in my PC
2. choose hda
3. 

Actual Results:
Blockin PB. I installed Suse 8.

Expected Results:
Wanted RH 7.3


Additional Information:
Comment 1 Michael Fulbright 2002-06-17 12:26:31 EDT 
We are now using the parted partitioning library that has more tests to see if a
partitioning scheme is intact.

If you could send us a listing of the partitions on your system we might be able
to see if there is a problem with parted.
Comment 2 Michael Fulbright 2002-07-15 12:50:40 EDT 
Closing due to inactivity, please reopen if you have additional information.
Comment 3 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 13:49:06 EST 
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.