Hide Forgot
Created attachment 472281 [details] Contract Selection dialog should stay above the parent. Description of problem: When subscribing to a pool in the subscription-manager-gui, a "Contract Selection" dialog pops up. This dialog needs to: - center itself to the parent window "Subscription Manager". Currently it renders to the 0,0 corner of the display. That's lame. - be modal to its parent window "Subscription Manager" such that it always remains on top. Currently you can click the "Subscription Manager" window and raise it over the "Contract Selection" dialog while the focus remains in the "Contract Selection" dialog. That's not good. See the attached screenhot. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@jsefler-onprem01 ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-gnome subscription-manager-gnome-0.93.9-1.git.17.9bab7c0.el6.x86_64
commit 65873c605be3c420925a7f831391c2e9b33d7891 Author: Adrian Likins <alikins@redhat.com> Date: Wed Jan 12 13:14:24 2011 -0500 668054: center contract selection dialog Make it a dialog hint, which makes it behave more "modal" and centers it. Add default hbox orientation and remove unneeded "swapped" messages for contract_selection and allsubs glade files. Change treeview to use "automatic" for it's scrollbar policy to get the full widget to show up sans scrolling. Also remove default size requests for the treeview. Pass in parent top level window to contract_selection so "center on parent" works
The new contract selection dialog opens centered on the parent window and it always remains on top. Tested in version: subscription-manager-0.93.13-1.git.11.e083aba.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-firstboot-0.93.13-1.git.11.e083aba.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-gnome-0.93.13-1.git.11.e083aba.el6.x86_64
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0611.html