Bug 668354 - autofs handle isspace() char incorrectly
Summary: autofs handle isspace() char incorrectly
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: autofs
Version: 5.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ian Kent
QA Contact: Jian Li
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 666340
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-01-10 07:39 UTC by Zhenyong(Jerry) Jiang
Modified: 2018-11-14 15:55 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.152.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 666340
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-21 08:44:57 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1079 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE autofs bug fix and enhancement update 2011-07-21 08:37:25 UTC

Comment 1 Zhenyong(Jerry) Jiang 2011-01-10 07:41:01 UTC 
I cloned bug 666340 for RHEL6 to this one for RHEL5.
Comment 4 Jian Li 2011-05-05 06:57:11 UTC 
This bug is verified, tested in the job (https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/81485), which runs testcase(/CoreOS/autofs/bugzillas/bz666340), on distro RHEL5.7-Server-20110504.0.n.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 08:44:57 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1079.html
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 12:35:32 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1079.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.