Bug 668454 - Please Build rubygem-activerecord for el6
Summary: Please Build rubygem-activerecord for el6
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: rubygem-activerecord
Version: el6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Stahnke
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 773394 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-01-10 15:04 UTC by Sandro
Modified: 2014-10-11 03:52 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-10-11 03:52:45 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sandro 2011-01-10 15:04:34 UTC 
Could you please build rubygem-activerecord for el6. I tried a mock build and did not encounter any problems. Scratch build in Koji works fine as well - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2712333
Comment 1 Michael Stahnke 2011-01-14 16:40:54 UTC 
We're still evaluating which version of the Rails stack will go into EL6.  There quite a push for Rails 3, which means the version of AR would be 3 also.
Comment 2 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 2011-07-27 13:58:34 UTC 
Any progress on this in the past 6 months?
Comment 3 Michael Stahnke 2012-01-11 21:43:20 UTC 
*** Bug 773394 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Michael Arnold 2012-02-26 17:50:22 UTC 
It has been over a year.  What is taking so long?
Comment 5 Matt Hyclak 2012-03-06 16:42:20 UTC 
Any pointers to discussions users could weigh in on?
Comment 6 Michael Arnold 2012-04-26 05:02:22 UTC 
2.3.8 version of the Rails stack is available at http://rpm.razorsedge.org/ in the EL6 testing repo:
http://rpm.razorsedge.org/centos-6/RE-test/
Comment 7 Michael Stahnke 2014-10-11 03:52:45 UTC 
I don't think building AR at 2.3.8 would be a good idea. the Active Libraries have had many security issues over the last 2 years, and attempting to maintain them in EPEL for another 5 or so years seems like it wouldn't go well. I'm happy to give commit rights (or lobby for them) to another packager to do so.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.