Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 668549

Summary:	Cobbler doesn't import httpd_sys_content_t labeled stuff while SELinux enabled
Product:	[Retired] Fedora Documentation	Reporter:	Renich Bon Ciric <renich>
Component:	install-guide	Assignee:	Petr Bokoc <pbokoc>
Status:	CLOSED WORKSFORME	QA Contact:	Ruediger Landmann <rlandman+disabled>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	devel	CC:	me, pbokoc, rlandman
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-06-27 23:09:46 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Renich Bon Ciric 2011-01-10 19:06:05 UTC

Description of problem:
While SELinux is enabled, it will not let /mnt/dvd be imported if mounted with the httpd_sys_content_t label.

It shouldn't suggested to mount things in /mnt with a httpd_sys_content_t label. SELinux complains about it not having the label it should (mnt_t).

It, actually, worked with the default label: iso9660_t

Other SELinux issues which where reported with Mr. Walsh
  
Actual results:
Not working the way you suggest

Expected results:
It should work

Comment 1 Jack Reed 2011-10-27 06:13:35 UTC

Thanks for this, Renich.

For the F16 version of the guide, I've added a note to the distribution setup procedure explaining that the default label should be used in this case.

The draft can be found at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Installation_Guide/sn-cobbler-setup-distro.html

Cheers,

Jack

Comment 2 Renich Bon Ciric 2011-10-27 07:01:46 UTC

;=)

Glad to know.

Comment 3 Karsten Wade 2011-12-14 03:47:19 UTC

Removing myself for these bug components as I'm either no longer involved in that aspect of the project, or no longer care to watch this particular bug. Sorry if you are caught in a maelstrom of bug changes as a result!

Comment 5 Pete Travis 2013-06-17 16:37:12 UTC

Cobbler deployment really isn't as straightforward as we've presented it.  I think it's a great tool, but it should be comprehensively documented or not at all. How about commenting this section out until the content is built up appropriately?

Comment 6 Pete Travis 2014-06-27 23:09:46 UTC

The immediate issue has been addressed here. I'll take my questions to a more appropriate venue.