RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 668796 - new sm-gui is too big in firstboot beta builds
Summary: new sm-gui is too big in firstboot beta builds
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: subscription-manager
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Bryan Kearney
QA Contact: John Sefler
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: Entitlement-Beta
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-01-11 16:39 UTC by John Sefler
Modified: 2013-01-10 10:48 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 13:38:46 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
subscription-manager-gui is too wide in firstboot (161.95 KB, image/png)
2011-01-11 16:39 UTC, John Sefler 		no flags Details
from paul (81.75 KB, application/pdf)
2011-01-11 18:49 UTC, Bryan Kearney 		no flags Details
Still too wide and too tall. Can't reach Forward or Back buttons. I'M STUCK! (159.34 KB, image/png)
2011-01-14 20:02 UTC, John Sefler 		no flags Details
Results of hte compose from 18 January. (143.23 KB, image/png)
2011-01-19 14:44 UTC, Bryan Kearney 		no flags Details
sm-gui is firstboot is sized well (138.77 KB, image/png)
2011-01-24 17:26 UTC, John Sefler 		no flags Details
sm-gui is firstboot is sized well (147.26 KB, image/png)
2011-01-24 17:27 UTC, John Sefler 		no flags Details
sm-gui is firstboot is sized well (158.78 KB, image/png)
2011-01-24 17:27 UTC, John Sefler 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2011:0611 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE new package: subscription-manager 2011-05-18 17:56:21 UTC

Description John Sefler 2011-01-11 16:39:42 UTC 
Created attachment 472845 [details]
subscription-manager-gui is too wide in firstboot

Description of problem:
See the attached screenshoot


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 John Sefler 2011-01-11 16:40:56 UTC 
http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/devel/candidates/RHEL6.1-20110110.4/
Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2011-01-11 18:49:10 UTC 
Created attachment 472868 [details]
from paul
Comment 4 Bryan Kearney 2011-01-11 18:49:43 UTC 
please fix in line with attachment.
Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2011-01-14 13:20:00 UTC 
in the code base. However, look for another fix from 668581.
Comment 8 John Sefler 2011-01-14 20:02:31 UTC 
Created attachment 473578 [details]
Still too wide and too tall.  Can't reach Forward or Back buttons.  I'M STUCK!
Comment 9 John Sefler 2011-01-14 20:20:13 UTC 
http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/devel/candidates/RHEL6.1-20110114.0/

[root@jsefler-betaqa-1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep subscription-manager
subscription-manager-firstboot-0.93.12-1.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-0.93.12-1.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-gnome-0.93.12-1.el6.x86_64

moving back to ON_DEV
Comment 10 Bryan Kearney 2011-01-19 14:44:02 UTC 
Created attachment 474283 [details]
Results of hte compose from 18 January.
Comment 11 Bryan Kearney 2011-01-19 14:44:42 UTC 
So close! Can we ditch the massive title bar? Perhaps that would bring up the buttons at the bottom.
Comment 12 James Bowes 2011-01-20 13:42:42 UTC 
The title bar is added by firstboot itself, i don't think we can remove it :(
Comment 13 Justin Harris 2011-01-21 20:03:50 UTC 
I changed with height params of a lot of those widgets, so it should be able to shrink down in firstboot now.
Comment 15 John Sefler 2011-01-24 17:24:45 UTC 
VERIFYING....
[root@jsefler-onprem01 rhn]# rpm -qa | grep subscription-manager
subscription-manager-gnome-0.93.14-1.git.5.2f147f3.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-0.93.14-1.git.5.2f147f3.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-firstboot-0.93.14-1.git.5.2f147f3.el6.x86_64

Yes - all has been squeezed on the firstboot panels.
See attached screenshots.

Moving to VERIFIED.
Comment 16 John Sefler 2011-01-24 17:26:43 UTC 
Created attachment 474998 [details]
sm-gui is firstboot is sized well
Comment 17 John Sefler 2011-01-24 17:27:17 UTC 
Created attachment 474999 [details]
sm-gui is firstboot is sized well
Comment 18 John Sefler 2011-01-24 17:27:39 UTC 
Created attachment 475000 [details]
sm-gui is firstboot is sized well
Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:38:46 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0611.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.