Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 669863

Summary: DW_TAG_template_type_param and DW_TAG_template_value_param missing
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil>
Component: gccAssignee: Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0CC: patrickm
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-06-16 14:05:08 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 562758    
Attachments:
Description Flags
temargs.cc gdb testcase part. none

Description Jan Kratochvil 2011-01-15 07:32:20 UTC
Created attachment 473629 [details]
temargs.cc gdb testcase part.

Description of problem:
Bug 562758 - [RFE] gdb support of template parameters
works in F14 gcc45 but not in RHEL-6.0 gcc44.
If gcc45 will be present as alternative in RHEL-6.0 it may be enough.
Will it be present?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gdb.cp/temargs.exp:
PASS in F14 gcc-4.5.1-4.fc14.x86_64
XFAILs in RHEL-6.0 gcc-4.4.4-13.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
FSF GDB HEAD or F14 GDB:
runtest gdb.cp/temargs.exp 

Actual results:
# of expected passes		8
# of expected failures		12
# of known failures		6

XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test type of T in base_m
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test value of I in base_m
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test value of P in base_m
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test value of P in inner_m
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test type of Z in inner_m
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test type of T in func
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test value of I in func
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test value of P in func
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test type of T in templ_m
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test value of I in templ_m
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test value of P in templ_m
XFAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test type of Q in templ_m

Expected results:
# of expected passes		19
# of unexpected failures	1
# of known failures		6

Additional info:

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2011-04-04 02:00:17 UTC
Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-06-16 14:05:08 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.