Bug 670732 - [abrt] openoffice.org-writer-1:3.3.0-18.2.fc14: atomic_exchange_and_add: Process /usr/lib64/openoffice.org3/program/swriter.bin was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] openoffice.org-writer-1:3.3.0-18.2.fc14: atomic_exchange_and_add: Proc...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 659394
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openoffice.org
Version: 14
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Caolan McNamara
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:11238a658aa317de15e8c696e4f...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-01-19 06:30 UTC by Gideon Mayhak
Modified: 2011-01-19 06:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-19 06:56:47 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (53.00 KB, text/plain)
2011-01-19 06:30 UTC, Gideon Mayhak
no flags Details

Description Gideon Mayhak 2011-01-19 06:30:19 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib64/openoffice.org3/program/swriter.bin -writer file:///home/gideon/.cache/.fr-8chNNU/Office%20Open%20XML%20Part%201%20-%20Fundamentals.docx
comment: I can't say I'm surprised the DOCX file didn't open, but it would be nice if it would.
component: openoffice.org
crash_function: atomic_exchange_and_add
executable: /usr/lib64/openoffice.org3/program/swriter.bin
kernel: 2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64
package: openoffice.org-writer-1:3.3.0-18.2.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib64/openoffice.org3/program/swriter.bin was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1295417719
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. I downloaded the first zipped DOCX file from here:
    http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm
2. Opened the archive with File Roller
3. Double-clicked the DOCX file to open it in OpenOffice.org

Comment 1 Gideon Mayhak 2011-01-19 06:30:21 UTC
Created attachment 474199 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 David Tardon 2011-01-19 06:56:47 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 659394 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.