RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 670917 - Evolution reports cancelled meeting is in disabled calendar
Summary: Evolution reports cancelled meeting is in disabled calendar
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: evolution
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-01-19 16:47 UTC by Marc Milgram
Modified: 2014-01-02 10:45 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: evolution-2.32.3-3.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 04:59:19 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
GNOME Bugzilla 616561 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2013:1540 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Low: evolution security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2013-11-21 00:40:51 UTC

Description Marc Milgram 2011-01-19 16:47:31 UTC 
Description of problem:
I have two versions of each of my calendars - a Webcal version, and a Caldav version.  The Webcal versions are all disabled.  I received email with an appointment cancellation.  Evolution reported, "Found appointment in the calendar", and listed a Webcal calendar that I currently have disabled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
evolution-2.28.3-10.el6.x86_64


How reproducible:
Seems to be

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Configure Caldav access to a calendar
2. Configure Webdav access to the same calendar
3. Disable Webdav access to the calendar
4. Make sure that a completely separate (Caldav?) calendar is the default calendar.
5. Receive and accept an appointment invitation
6. Receive an appointment cancelation for the appointment

Actual results:
Evolution shows that it found the appointment in the Webdav Calendar

Expected results:
Evolution shows that it found the calendar in the Caldav calendar

Additional info:
Comment 2 Milan Crha 2011-01-20 07:21:04 UTC 
Sort of NotABug, it searches in all configured calendars, or in those setup in Edit->Preferences->Mail Preferences->tab Calendar and Tasks, section "Conflict search". I  believe it's correct to not take into account sources checked in the Calendar view, because it's just your current view on your calendars, which might not reflect your needs on meeting invitation lookup.

What about skipping read-only calendars? Though you can have there a meeting scheduled and as not an organizer you may not update the meeting anyway.

Other option would be to always use only calendars checked for conflict searching and never all configured calendars?
Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-04-04 01:52:18 UTC 
Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 4 Milan Crha 2013-05-09 17:53:55 UTC 
Upstream fix to not check read-only calendars:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616561

It cannot be backported as such (it landed in time for 3.4.0), it's just for a reference what the current upstream code uses.
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 04:59:19 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1540.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.