Bug 670939 - .py files for gdb should also be distributed in compiled form
Summary: .py files for gdb should also be distributed in compiled form
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: glib2
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Colin Walters
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-01-19 17:32 UTC by Paolo Bonzini
Modified: 2017-12-06 11:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 670861
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-06 11:13:53 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Paolo Bonzini 2011-01-19 17:32:08 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #670861 +++

Description of problem:
The /usr/share/glib-2.0/gdb/glib.pyc and /usr/share/glib-2.0/gdb/gobject.pyc files are not packaged.  The Fedora packaging conventions for Python demand that the byte-compiled files are shipped in the packages (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Byte_compiling).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
all

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qf /usr/share/glib-2.0/gdb/* | sort -u
  
Actual results:
file /usr/share/glib-2.0/gdb/glib.pyc is not owned by any package
file /usr/share/glib-2.0/gdb/gobject.pyc is not owned by any package
glib2-devel-2.27.91-1.fc15.x86_64

Expected results:
glib2-devel-2.27.91-1.fc15.x86_64
Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-04-04 01:51:50 UTC 
Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 5 RHEL Program Management 2013-10-14 05:21:56 UTC 
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 6 Jan Kurik 2017-12-06 11:13:53 UTC 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 is in the Production 3 Phase. During the Production 3 Phase, Critical impact Security Advisories (RHSAs) and selected Urgent Priority Bug Fix Advisories (RHBAs) may be released as they become available.

The official life cycle policy can be reviewed here:

http://redhat.com/rhel/lifecycle

This issue does not meet the inclusion criteria for the Production 3 Phase and will be marked as CLOSED/WONTFIX. If this remains a critical requirement, please contact Red Hat Customer Support to request a re-evaluation of the issue, citing a clear business justification. Note that a strong business justification will be required for re-evaluation. Red Hat Customer Support can be contacted via the Red Hat Customer Portal at the following URL:

https://access.redhat.com/
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.