Bug 671087 - [fix available] file locks are not created with gvfs-sftp volumes with OpenOffice.org
Summary: [fix available] file locks are not created with gvfs-sftp volumes with OpenOf...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openoffice.org
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: David Tardon
QA Contact: desktop-bugs@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 668057
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-01-20 09:25 UTC by RHEL Program Management
Modified: 2013-01-10 13:09 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-28 15:25:06 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:0183 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: openoffice.org security and bug fix update 2011-01-28 15:24:30 UTC

Description RHEL Program Management 2011-01-20 09:25:26 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #668057 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.0 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 4 Matthew Mosesohn 2011-01-20 14:26:17 UTC 
This patch contains a regression that makes this problem worse.

If you write a new file to a gvfs-sftp volume, it writes with mask 0600 and ignores setgid permission bit on a folder.

Steps to reproduce:
Create a folder on a server with permissions 2770
Connect via SFTP to this server
Write a new file inside of this folder

The resulting file has permissions 0600, but should have 0660

Please don't go forward with pushing this fix until this regression can be fixed.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-28 15:25:06 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0183.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.