Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 671087 - [fix available] file locks are not created with gvfs-sftp volumes with OpenOffice.org
[fix available] file locks are not created with gvfs-sftp volumes with OpenOf...
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openoffice.org (Show other bugs)
6.1
Unspecified Unspecified
low Severity high
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: David Tardon
desktop-bugs@redhat.com
: ZStream
Depends On: 668057
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-01-20 04:25 EST by RHEL Product and Program Management
Modified: 2013-01-10 08:09 EST (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-28 10:25:06 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:0183 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: openoffice.org security and bug fix update 2011-01-28 10:24:30 EST

  None (edit)
Description RHEL Product and Program Management 2011-01-20 04:25:26 EST
This bug has been copied from bug #668057 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.0 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 4 Matthew Mosesohn 2011-01-20 09:26:17 EST
This patch contains a regression that makes this problem worse.

If you write a new file to a gvfs-sftp volume, it writes with mask 0600 and ignores setgid permission bit on a folder.

Steps to reproduce:
Create a folder on a server with permissions 2770
Connect via SFTP to this server
Write a new file inside of this folder

The resulting file has permissions 0600, but should have 0660

Please don't go forward with pushing this fix until this regression can be fixed.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-28 10:25:06 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0183.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.