RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 671355 - Can't boot from 9th or further HDD.
Summary: Can't boot from 9th or further HDD.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: grub
Version: 6.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Peter Jones
QA Contact: Release Test Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 691780 705163
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-01-21 11:06 UTC by Jan Holčapek
Modified: 2013-01-11 03:45 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: grub-0.97-72.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 609153
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 18:00:16 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1720 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE grub bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 01:02:13 UTC

Description Jan Holčapek 2011-01-21 11:06:35 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #609153 +++

Created attachment 427699 [details]
Patch allowing GRUB for recognizing up to 128 hard drives.

Description of problem:
GRUB can't recognize, ie. can't be installed and load stage2 loader off the 9th and further HDD.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
grub-0.97-64.fc13, but effectively any Legacy GRUB, ie. based on GRUB 0.97 sources.

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start the installation on a HW setup with 9 (or more) hard drives.
2. Choose to install the OS on the 9th (or further) hard drive, use default disk layout.
3. Wait until the installation finishes, and reboot.
  
Actual results:
GRUB was root-ed on (hd7,0), ie. 8th hard drive.


Expected results:
GRUB should be root-ed on (hd8,0), ie. 9th (or further) hard drive.


Additional info:
This was seen on physical SAN setup, where /dev/sd[a-m] devices were part of multipath devices, and system disk was /dev/cciss/c0d0. I have also recreated the issue in VMWare Workstation virtual machine with 9 disks. However, I have some troubles recreating this in KVM virtual machine.

Comment 1 Jan Holčapek 2011-01-21 11:07:34 UTC
Patch is attached to the original bug report (BZ 609153).

Comment 5 Pavel Holica 2011-10-25 08:56:32 UTC
Setting Verified: SanityOnly according to Comment 2.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 18:00:16 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1720.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.