Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 67353

Summary: dvipdfm worth including?
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Aleksey Nogin <aleksey>
Component: distributionAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.0CC: rvokal
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://gaspra.kettering.edu/dvipdfm/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-03-25 16:59:19 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 83355    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Aleksey Nogin 2002-06-23 09:15:46 UTC
Dvipdfm (see http://gaspra.kettering.edu/dvipdfm/ and
http://nogin.org/RPM/dvipdfm.html) is a DVI to PDF translator. Its features
include TeX \special's that approximate the functionality of the PostScript
pdfmarks used by Adobe Acrobat Distiller, the ability to include PDF files and
JPEG files as embedded images, support for both Type1 and PK fonts, support for
arbitrary linear graphics transformations, a color stack accessible via
\special's, partial font embedding and stream compression for reduced output
file size, native, portable graphics via TPIC \specials, balanced page and
destination trees for improved reader access on very large document files.

Comment 1 Aleksey Nogin 2003-03-08 21:21:44 UTC
If I understand correctly, TeTeX includes dvipdfm starting with version 2.0

Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2003-03-08 21:41:32 UTC
dvipdfm also has security issues.

Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2003-03-25 16:59:19 UTC
The ones I pointed out to the maintainer a while back seem to have already been
dealt with.