Bug 674870 - setfattr doesn't accept 0x2 as the value [documentation bug]
Summary: setfattr doesn't accept 0x2 as the value [documentation bug]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: attr
Version: 6.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Kamil Dudka
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 587516 651120
Blocks: 719902
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-03 15:38 UTC by Ivana Varekova
Modified: 2011-09-13 13:58 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Prior to this update, supported methods for encoding values of the extended attributes were not properly described in the setfattr(1) man page. This update fixes the problem by adding appropriate descriptions of the encoding methods to the setfattr(1) man page.
Clone Of: 651120
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-09-07 13:07:36 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1272 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE attr bug fix update 2011-09-07 13:07:08 UTC

Comment 4 Petr Kovar 2011-06-29 11:13:13 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Prior to this update, supported methods for encoding values of the extended attributes were not properly described in the setfattr(1) man page. This update fixes the problem by adding appropriate descriptions of the encoding methods to the setfattr(1) man page.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2011-09-07 13:07:36 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1272.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.