Bug 674883 - ACL: setfacl -x does not fail when asked to remove a non-existent Access Control Entry
Summary: ACL: setfacl -x does not fail when asked to remove a non-existent Access Cont...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: acl
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Kamil Dudka
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 658734
Blocks: 719902
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-03 16:14 UTC by Ivana Varekova
Modified: 2011-09-13 13:57 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Prior to this update, the setfacl.1 man page was not intelligible in that it did not state that removing a non-existent ACL entry is not considered to be an error. With this update, the setfacl.1 man page has been updated so that its content is now intelligible and exactly specifies the aforementioned behavior with regard to removing a non-existent ACL entry.
Clone Of: 658734
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-06 13:24:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0924 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE acl bug fix update 2011-07-06 13:24:24 UTC

Comment 4 Petr Kovar 2011-06-28 10:49:04 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Prior to this update, the setfacl.1 man page was not intelligible in that it did not state that removing a non-existent ACL entry is not considered to be an error. With this update, the setfacl.1 man page has been updated so that its content is now intelligible and exactly specifies the aforementioned behavior with regard to removing a non-existent ACL entry.
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-06 13:24:29 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0924.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.