Bug 676318 - [abrt] java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-49.1.8.5.fc13: os::abort: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/bin/java was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-49.1.8.5.fc13: os::abort: Process /usr/li...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Deepak Bhole
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:20eb005596ccaef5e85e5c90d32...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-09 14:21 UTC by burkinafaso76
Modified: 2011-02-15 14:27 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-02-15 14:27:04 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (192.70 KB, text/plain)
2011-02-09 14:21 UTC, burkinafaso76 		no flags Details
View All

Description burkinafaso76 2011-02-09 14:21:29 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/lib/i386/../../bin/java sun.applet.PluginMain /tmp/icedteaplugin-bianchi/22585-icedteanp-plugin-to-appletviewer /tmp/icedteaplugin-bianchi/22585-icedteanp-appletviewer-to-plugin
component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
crash_function: os::abort
executable: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/bin/java
kernel: 2.6.34.7-66.fc13.i686.PAE
package: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-49.1.8.5.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/bin/java was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
time: 1297261031
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1.I was following a web conference on freetrial.webex.com
2. Closed the page
3.
Comment 1 burkinafaso76 2011-02-09 14:21:32 UTC 
Created attachment 477825 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Deepak Bhole 2011-02-15 14:27:04 UTC 
The error originated from something Webex (/home/bianchi/.webex/1124/libtpwrap.so::CWrapThread::Run()) tried to do. There is nothing we can do about this on the JVM side.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.