Bug 67710 - https://xmlrpc.rhn.redhat.com displays default Apache test page
Summary: https://xmlrpc.rhn.redhat.com displays default Apache test page
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Network
Classification: Retired
Component: RHN/Web Site
Version: RHN Stable
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Chip Turner
QA Contact: Fanny Augustin
URL: https://xmlrpc.rhn.redhat.com/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 76982
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-06-30 13:39 UTC by Kiat Huang
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:43 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-02-19 00:54:34 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Kiat Huang 2002-06-30 13:39:04 UTC 
How Reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to https://xmlrpc.rhn.redhat.com/
2. Either from an internal redhat.com ip or from my external domain:
huang.dyndns.org

Actual Results:
The default Apache test page is served.

Expected Results:
Redirect to RHN site


Additional Information:
Comment 1 Josef Komenda 2002-07-02 20:58:39 UTC 
Chip, is this even a bug? Why would someone browse to this page?
Comment 2 Mihai Ibanescu 2002-10-31 22:21:28 UTC 
They wouldn't normally, but it looks really bad. Additionally, it displays an
SSL mismatch between the host's name and the Common Name.

Chip, can we redirect / to rhn.redhat.com? Or we did this before and we confused
the load balancer?
Comment 3 Todd Warner 2002-12-09 20:18:33 UTC 
It's been a couple months... status?
Comment 4 Cristian Gafton 2003-02-19 00:54:34 UTC 
That is by design. We need to have a real page there for the CSS to work
correctly. We can not redirect. No normal website traffic should be done on
xmlrpc.rhn.redhat.com - if you point a browser to it you get to keep all the
broken bits.

NOTABUG
Comment 5 Chip Turner 2003-02-19 02:32:18 UTC 
if you hit it now, you get a simple page that says 'Red Hat Network' -- at
least, that's what I get.  can anyone confirm the problem is 'fixed' (not
blatantly wrong) anymore?
Comment 6 Josef Komenda 2003-02-19 15:06:58 UTC 
Mo' betta.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.