Bug 677893 - [TestOnly] gfs regression testing for 5.7 beta
Summary: [TestOnly] gfs regression testing for 5.7 beta
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 5.7
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Robert Peterson
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-16 08:33 UTC by Qian Cai
Modified: 2011-07-21 10:22 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-21 10:22:05 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:1065 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.7 kernel security and bug fix update 2011-07-21 09:21:37 UTC

Description Qian Cai 2011-02-16 08:33:43 UTC
Description of problem:
There are 8 GFS BZs plus some of general fs layer BZs in 5.7 so far. This is the request to catch regression in gfs for beta milestone.

Comment 6 RHEL Program Management 2011-02-18 03:40:09 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 10 Nate Straz 2011-06-13 14:38:59 UTC
All listed bug have been marked VERIFIED.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 10:22:05 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1065.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.