Bug 678366 - fence management not fully functional
Summary: fence management not fully functional
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: luci
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ryan McCabe
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-17 17:20 UTC by Brian Brock
Modified: 2011-05-19 13:56 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: luci-0.23.0-4.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 13:56:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0655 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE luci bug fix update 2011-05-19 09:47:45 UTC

Description Brian Brock 2011-02-17 17:20:15 UTC
Fence management in luci is broken.  Existing fence methods cannot be removed from a device, and new fence instances cannot be created

luci-0.23.0-3.el6
ricci-0.16.2-28.el6

reliably reproduced with no workarounds yet in test environment

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a basic cluster
2. add a fence device to the cluster (tested with fence_scsi and fence_sanbox2)
3. add a fence method of that type to a node
4. new method is unmanageable in interface

- the new method cannot be removed
- the new method cannot have fence instances added to it
  

Expected to be able to configure a fence instance for a node, and manipulate the fencing configuration in the luci interface

Initially seen with google chrome, will follow-up with test results from other browsers.

Comment 3 Brian Brock 2011-02-17 19:06:36 UTC
firefox also seems to show the bug

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:56:50 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0655.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.