Bug 679743 - Documentation typo about supported size
Summary: Documentation typo about supported size
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 660364
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Global_File_System_2
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Steven J. Levine
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-23 11:59 UTC by Amaya Rosa Gil Pippino
Modified: 2011-02-23 20:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-02-23 20:28:41 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Amaya Rosa Gil Pippino 2011-02-23 11:59:07 UTC
Description of problem:
In the official documentation page for GFS2 on RHEL6 (http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/Global_File_System_2/index.html) it states GFS2 is based on a 64-bit architecture, which can theoretically accommodate an 8 EB file system. However, the current supported maximum size of a GFS2 file system is 25 TB. If your system requires GFS2 file systems larger than 25 TB, contact your Red Hat service representative. 

However this is not correct according to both http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/ and previous GFS2 on RHEL5 documentation.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

This is a documentation error

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:

Consistency in all the documents should be expected

Additional info:

http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/Global_File_System_2/index.html
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html-single/Global_File_System_2/index.html

Comment 2 Steven J. Levine 2011-02-23 20:28:41 UTC
This bug was reported in BZ 660364 (which I cloned off as RHEL 5 bugs for both GFS and GFS2 for RHEL 5.6, which has since been released).

I am closing this bug as a duplicate of that bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 660364 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.