RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 679822 - Checkbox usability request in Compliance Assistant
Summary: Checkbox usability request in Compliance Assistant
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: subscription-manager
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Bryan Kearney
QA Contact: J.C. Molet
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: rhsm-rhel62
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-23 15:34 UTC by J.C. Molet
Modified: 2013-01-10 10:50 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 17:13:05 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1695 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE subscription-manager bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 01:23:29 UTC

Description J.C. Molet 2011-02-23 15:34:18 UTC
Description of problem:
When using the compliance assistant one has to check all the products they want to show in the subscriptions field.  After a subscription is subscribed to, the window refreshes: the newly 'in-compliance' products are removed from the products, the search is updated, and all the products are unchecked.  To continue searching for subscriptions, you have to check all the boxes you want again and again until you are done with the tool.  This makes the tool a bit unwieldy.

What I propose:
- A check/uncheck all checkbox at the top of the column.
- Check box state is remembered across subscribes (if it was checked before subscribing to something, it will still be checked after subscribing if the product is still in the list).

Comment 3 James Bowes 2011-08-04 16:40:55 UTC
fixed in master, a20793c1a6f2ab4d5ab253cb7fc709e5faa586f8

Comment 4 James Bowes 2011-08-08 14:35:01 UTC
oops, didn't add the check/uncheck all option. i'll do that now.

Comment 5 James Bowes 2011-08-10 14:21:54 UTC
check/uncheck all now in master, 8802aebfc8a89e6f2c904f912512dad3dd50dc53

Comment 7 J.C. Molet 2011-08-11 16:50:37 UTC
This works as described, the check all button even follows keyboard accessibility with alt + C 

subscription-manager-gnome-0.96.5-1.git.19.8802aeb.el6.x86_64

moving to VERIFIED.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 17:13:05 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1695.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.