Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 681660

Summary: Conflict in 32 bit and 64 bit devel packages
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Ondrej Moriš <omoris>
Component: libgssglueAssignee: Steve Dickson <steved>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Zbysek MRAZ <zmraz>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 6.1CC: atodorov, ebenes, mhideo, zmraz
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libgssglue-0.1-10.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 14:29:18 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 682670    
Attachments:
Description Flags
The needed patch none

Description Ondrej Moriš 2011-03-02 20:59:56 UTC
Description of problem:

TPS jobs are failing on ppcp, s390x and x86_64 since there is a conflict (see below) in /usr/include/gssglue/gssapi/gssapi.h between 32 bit and 64 bit devel package: 

9c9 
< #define SIZEOF_LONG 4 
--- 
> #define SIZEOF_LONG 8 
11c11 
< #define SIZEOF_SIZE_T 4 
--- 
> #define SIZEOF_SIZE_T 8 

Why do those files differ? 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

libgssglue-0.1-9.el6
libgssglue-devel-0.1-9.el6

How reproducible:

Always.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. tps-rpmtest -e 2010:10841 (on 64 bit archs)
  
Actual results:

Upgrade test FAILED Output from RPM Command: file /usr/include/gssglue/gssapi/gssapi.h conflicts between attempted installs of libgssglue-devel-0.1-9.el6.x86_64 and libgssglue-devel-0.1-9.el6.i686 

Expected results:

No conflicts.

Comment 5 Steve Dickson 2011-03-28 13:44:36 UTC
Created attachment 488149 [details]
The needed patch

Comment 7 Zbysek MRAZ 2011-03-31 08:33:57 UTC
The problem still persits. The packages are conflicting with the same reason as in comment#0. Could you please take a look?

Comment 9 Eduard Benes 2011-04-06 13:23:52 UTC
Looks like there is a similar bug which could be closed with this one, correct?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658046

Comment 10 Steve Dickson 2011-04-06 13:29:25 UTC
*** Bug 658046 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 14:29:18 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0789.html