Bug 681660 - Conflict in 32 bit and 64 bit devel packages
Summary: Conflict in 32 bit and 64 bit devel packages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libgssglue
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Steve Dickson
QA Contact: Zbysek MRAZ
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 658046 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 682670
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-02 20:59 UTC by Ondrej Moriš
Modified: 2013-07-03 13:13 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libgssglue-0.1-10.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 14:29:18 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The needed patch (454 bytes, patch)
2011-03-28 13:44 UTC, Steve Dickson
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0789 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE libgssglue bug fix update 2011-05-18 18:08:14 UTC

Description Ondrej Moriš 2011-03-02 20:59:56 UTC
Description of problem:

TPS jobs are failing on ppcp, s390x and x86_64 since there is a conflict (see below) in /usr/include/gssglue/gssapi/gssapi.h between 32 bit and 64 bit devel package: 

9c9 
< #define SIZEOF_LONG 4 
--- 
> #define SIZEOF_LONG 8 
11c11 
< #define SIZEOF_SIZE_T 4 
--- 
> #define SIZEOF_SIZE_T 8 

Why do those files differ? 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

libgssglue-0.1-9.el6
libgssglue-devel-0.1-9.el6

How reproducible:

Always.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. tps-rpmtest -e 2010:10841 (on 64 bit archs)
  
Actual results:

Upgrade test FAILED Output from RPM Command: file /usr/include/gssglue/gssapi/gssapi.h conflicts between attempted installs of libgssglue-devel-0.1-9.el6.x86_64 and libgssglue-devel-0.1-9.el6.i686 

Expected results:

No conflicts.

Comment 5 Steve Dickson 2011-03-28 13:44:36 UTC
Created attachment 488149 [details]
The needed patch

Comment 7 Zbysek MRAZ 2011-03-31 08:33:57 UTC
The problem still persits. The packages are conflicting with the same reason as in comment#0. Could you please take a look?

Comment 9 Eduard Benes 2011-04-06 13:23:52 UTC
Looks like there is a similar bug which could be closed with this one, correct?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658046

Comment 10 Steve Dickson 2011-04-06 13:29:25 UTC
*** Bug 658046 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 14:29:18 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0789.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.