Hide Forgot
Description of problem: TPS failure due to: "%{dist} found instead of %{?dist}" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-server-1.7.7-28.el6 How reproducible: 100%, all arches Steps to Reproduce: 1. Check TPS results Actual results: DIST CHECK: %{dist} found instead of %{?dist} in: xorg-x11-server-1.7.7-28.el6.src.rpm.spec Release string was: 28%{dist} -> FAIL Expected results: %{?dist} -> PASS Additional info: Single character change to the spec file to placate TPS.
Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as exception or blocker. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.
Fixed in xorg-x11-server-1.7.7-29.el6. MODIFIED
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: This field is the basis of the errata or release note for this bug. It can also be used for change logs. The Technical Note template, known as CCFR, is as follows: Cause What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present. Consequence What happens when the bug presents. Fix What was done to fix the bug.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0543.html