RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 685763 - [RFE] SNMP monitoring for LVS
Summary: [RFE] SNMP monitoring for LVS
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: piranha
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Marek Grac
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-15 13:55 UTC by J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Modified: 2018-11-14 14:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-15 14:45:46 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 660324 0 low CLOSED Add foghorn package to RHEL6.1 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 660324

Description J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) 2011-03-15 13:55:08 UTC
2. What is the nature and description of the request?
Being able to get piranha events via SNMP. In particular, for the services status to be available via SNMP queries.

This is similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660324 but
targeted at LVS/piranha instead of rgmanager.

   3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

- Customer intends to deploy LVS installations at Telecom operators in the coming years.
- RHEL LVS partially replaces load-balancing appliances that do have SNMP capabilities (e.g. Cisco 1150x).
- Lack of manageability will eventually be the cause of service outage.
- Service availability for an SMSC or MMSC will incur hourly costs of (depending on the customer) between US$ 20K and US$ 250K.
- SNMP manageability is seen as enterprise-grade functionality.
- Lack of SNMP manageability will reduce the number of places where customer can utilize Red Hat based load balancing and will have to use appliances, resulting in additional cost for customer, and thus, reduced income as we need to stay competitive. How often this will occur is unclear but the not having SNMP will prevent LVS from being deployed at several large customers who demand SNMP functionality.

   4. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
N/A

   5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Unknown

   6. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat bugzilla?
Similar to 660324

   7. How quickly does this need resolved? (desired target release)
"""Not having it now is acceptable but it must be a scheduled feature for the not-too-distant future."""
RHEL6.1 is a good candidate.

   8. Does this request meet the RHEL Inclusion criteria (please review)
Yes

   9. List the affected packages
Unsure

  10. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?
Unknown.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-03-15 14:45:46 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.