Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 68686 - 2.4.18-5 kernel does not have radeon DRM module
2.4.18-5 kernel does not have radeon DRM module
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
7.3
i686 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Arjan van de Ven
Brian Brock
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2002-07-12 11:42 EDT by Tim Miller
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:44 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-07-13 04:02:09 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Tim Miller 2002-07-12 11:42:53 EDT 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020606

Description of problem:
When upgrading my RH7.3 kernel from 2.4.18-3 to 2.4.18-5, I lost
direct rendering on my IBM Thinkpad A30 (Radeon Mobility).  I
traced the issue to kernel modules that did not load because
they were not PRESENT in the kernel package.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.4.18-5


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
/lib/modules# find . -name "radeon*"
./2.4.18-3/kernel/drivers/char/drm/radeon.o
./2.4.18-3/kernel/drivers/video/radeonfb.o
./2.4.18-5/kernel/drivers/video/radeonfb.o



Actual Results:  When booting 2.4.18-5, chromium game is painfully slow.  Graphics
are jerky and unplayable.  When booting 2.4.18-3 (NO OTHER CHANGES),
chromium game plays just fine.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Arjan van de Ven 2002-07-12 11:46:43 EDT 
Ok I bet the following is the case:

you installed the i386 kernel (instead of the i586, i686 or athlon one)

the i386 kernel doesn't have DRM support, the i586, i686 or athlon kernels DO
have DRM support....

is my assumption correct ?
Comment 2 Tim Miller 2002-07-12 19:08:33 EDT 
That was the problem.  I didn't realize I had installed the i386
kernel for one thing but I also didn't think it mattered.  Why
isn't DRM in i386?  (I am by far NOT a video guru)
Comment 3 Arjan van de Ven 2002-07-13 04:02:05 EDT 
The DRM code internally uses CPU instructions that are not available on a
80386......
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.