Bug 688048 - Instance fails to launch
Summary: Instance fails to launch
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: CloudForms Cloud Engine
Classification: Retired
Component: aeolus-conductor
Version: 0.3.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: beta
Assignee: Mike Orazi
QA Contact: wes hayutin
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-16 07:11 UTC by Shveta
Modified: 2012-01-26 12:23 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-16 13:55:40 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
err (54.57 KB, image/png)
2011-03-16 07:11 UTC, Shveta
no flags Details

Description Shveta 2011-03-16 07:11:42 UTC
Created attachment 485660 [details]
err

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Created a template of x86_64(only this is allowed)
2. Built the template.
3. Created a h/w profile of x86_64.
4. Launched an instance , which failed to launch with the following error in logs 

Deltacloud::BackendError - InvalidParameterValue: The requested instance type's architecture (x86_64) does not match the architecture in the manifest for ami-6226d30b (i386)
REQUEST=ec2.us-east-1.amazonaws.com:443/?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAI2KPFDYVZKSRTJMQ&Action=RunInstances&AddressingType=public&ImageId=ami-6226d30b&InstanceType=c1.xlarge&KeyName=ssachdev%40redhat.com_1300254272_key_70253946536020&MaxCount=1&MinCount=1&SignatureMethod=HmacSHA256&SignatureVersion=2&Timestamp=2011-03-16T06%3A55%3A30.000Z&Version=2010-08-31&Signature=FPl25zk67NAp4AgDzNAhF3bSlWcCqBGQtaCFczptlis%3D
REQUEST ID=ca5c763d-568d-4546-adb7-a3ef203a469d :
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/44068

there is conflict in architecture .

Comment 1 wes hayutin 2011-03-16 13:55:40 UTC
closing this bug as a duplicate, reopening the original bug and placing it on_qa to be tested on the latest build.  If there is still an issue found in the latest build we want to retain the history of the issue... so https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669246 will be reopened.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 669246 ***

Comment 2 wes hayutin 2011-12-08 13:56:08 UTC
perm close


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.