Description of problem: Upstream git commit 5e2b364ebd6808c43f46f7853d2fe6de4edbada1. commit 5e2b364ebd6808c43f46f7853d2fe6de4edbada1 Author: Bill Nottingham <notting> Date: Tue Mar 22 14:27:11 2011 -0400 Add a comment explaining the oft-confused -t nox,y,z mount syntax. The 'no' applies to all listed filesystem types, not just the first. Since this comes up in bugzilla once every month or two, explicitly comment it. diff --git a/rc.d/init.d/netfs b/rc.d/init.d/netfs index 8d9854f..77a0a68 100755 --- a/rc.d/init.d/netfs +++ b/rc.d/init.d/netfs @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ case "$1" in fi } touch /var/lock/subsys/netfs + # The 'no' applies to all listed filesystem types. See mount(8). action $"Mounting other filesystems: " mount -a -t nonfs,nfs4,cifs,ncpfs,gfs ;; stop) diff --git a/rc.d/rc.sysinit b/rc.d/rc.sysinit index ad2c83e..6067ea8 100755 --- a/rc.d/rc.sysinit +++ b/rc.d/rc.sysinit @@ -494,6 +494,7 @@ fi # Mount all other filesystems (except for NFS and /proc, which is already # mounted). Contrary to standard usage, # filesystems are NOT unmounted in single user mode. +# The 'no' applies to all listed filesystem types. See mount(8). if [ "$READONLY" != "yes" ] ; then action $"Mounting local filesystems: " mount -a -t nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs,gfs2 -O no_netdev else
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: With this update, an explanatory comment has been added to the /rc.d/init.d/netfs and the /rc.d/rc.sysinit init scripts regarding the "mount -t no*" syntax.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1081.html