Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 690238

Summary: Exception when calling lgetfilecon when selinux is disabled
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Component: libselinuxAssignee: Daniel Walsh <dwalsh>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.0   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-23 18:16:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 688461, 703384    

Description Miroslav Suchý 2011-03-23 16:53:14 UTC
Description of problem:
Set your system SELinux to disabled (not permissive) and run:
# mkdir /tmp/foo
Now it is:
# ls -ldZ /tmp/foo
drwxr-xr-x root root ?                                /tmp/foo

# python
Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Jan 21 2011, 12:09:10) 
[GCC 4.4.4 20100726 (Red Hat 4.4.4-13)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from selinux import lgetfilecon, is_selinux_enabled
>>> lgetfilecon('/tmp/foo')
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
OSError: [Errno 61] No data available


While on RHEL5.7 I get as result:
[-1, None]
and on Fedora 14:
[10, 'unlabeled']

I would expect to have on RHEL6 either None or 'unlabeled', but I do not expect exception.

It block BZ 688461, but we will probably workaround it using try/except as we could not wait for correct fix ... unless it will make it to RHEL6.1

Comment 2 Dave Malcolm 2011-03-23 18:02:02 UTC
The "selinux" python module is part of the libselinux-python rpm, a subpackage of libselinux.  Reassigning to the correct component.

Comment 3 Daniel Walsh 2011-03-23 18:16:51 UTC
This is not a bug.  This is by design.  You should catch the error.

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2011-03-23 23:58:41 UTC
Daniel, can you please enlighten me, why it is feature (or design)? When it behave completely different from RHEL5 and from Fedora14?

Comment 5 Daniel Walsh 2011-03-24 18:25:52 UTC
Because in python an application that fails on a read type access should throw an exception. RHEL5 we did not have this code.

Comment 6 Daniel Walsh 2011-03-24 18:26:51 UTC
I guess you could report this as a bug in RHEL5 that libselinux should be throwing exceptions on failures.

We just added a patch for libsemanage to throw exceptions on failures also.  This is only fixed in F15, currently.