Bug 690402 - iostat: bogus value appears when device is unmounted/mounted
Summary: iostat: bogus value appears when device is unmounted/mounted
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sysstat
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
urgent
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ivana Varekova
QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 675058
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-24 08:46 UTC by Ivana Varekova
Modified: 2011-05-19 13:59 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
previously, the "iostat -n" command was not aware of any NFS shares that were mounted or unmounted while processing. Consequently, iostat reported incorrect values such as: nfs:/share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 In this updated package the "iostat -n" command is made aware of any NFS shares that are mounted or unmounted while the command is running, and reports meaningful results.
Clone Of: 675058
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 13:59:07 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0668 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE sysstat bug fix and enhancement update 2011-05-18 18:10:53 UTC

Comment 2 Suzanne Logcher 2011-03-28 19:55:25 UTC 
Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains 
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as an 
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to 
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the 
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:59:07 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0668.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.