Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 690421 - [abrt] sssd-1.2.1-28.el6_0.4: _talloc_free: Process /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_be was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] sssd-1.2.1-28.el6_0.4: _talloc_free: Process /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_be...
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sssd (Show other bugs)
6.0
x86_64 Linux
low Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Stephen Gallagher
Chandrasekar Kannan
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 690814
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-03-24 06:23 EDT by prashant ingale
Modified: 2015-01-04 18:47 EST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: sssd-1.5.1-20.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 690814 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 07:42:32 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
backtrace (3.22 KB, text/plain)
2011-03-24 06:23 EDT, prashant ingale
no flags Details


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:0560 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Low: sssd security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2011-05-19 07:38:17 EDT

  None (edit)
Description prashant ingale 2011-03-24 06:23:23 EDT
Created attachment 487272 [details]
backtrace

Description of problem

sssd_be was killed by signal 11 in ssd.
reason: Process /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_be was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
  
architecture: x86_64
executable: /usr/libexec/sssd/sssd_be
package: sssd-1.2.1-28.el6_0.4
release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.0 (Santiago)

How reproducible:
randomly

Actual results:
sssd crashed.

Expected results:
sssd should not crashed

Additional info:
Comment 4 Stephen Gallagher 2011-03-25 09:19:46 EDT
We were able to track down the issue. It will be fixed in RHEL 6.1 final.
Comment 9 Stephen Gallagher 2011-03-28 08:16:40 EDT
I've made a yum repo available with a build to fix this issue. Please feel free to download http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/repo/690421/690421.repo and place it in your /etc/yum.repos.d folder and then update SSSD.

This repo should contain all of the dependencies necessary to run sssd-1.5.1-20.el6
Comment 10 Jenny Galipeau 2011-04-07 16:02:03 EDT
Jakub - can you please add steps to verify this bug.  Thanks
Comment 12 Gowrishankar Rajaiyan 2011-04-29 10:41:22 EDT
No crash detected. Marking it as VERIFIED SANITYONLY.

# rpm -qi sssd | head
Name        : sssd                         Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version     : 1.5.1                             Vendor: Red Hat, Inc.
Release     : 30.el6                        Build Date: Fri 15 Apr 2011
09:37:47 PM IST
Install Date: Mon 18 Apr 2011 05:36:41 PM IST      Build Host:
x86-005.build.bos.redhat.com
Group       : Applications/System           Source RPM:
sssd-1.5.1-30.el6.src.rpm
Size        : 3464053                          License: GPLv3+
Signature   : (none)
Packager    : Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla>
URL         : http://fedorahosted.org/sssd/
Summary     : System Security Services Daemon
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 07:42:32 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0560.html
Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 09:10:10 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0560.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.