Hide Forgot
Hi, please perform the following change : Change the storage version number from 23 to 1. (This bug is created as one of the requirements for feature at backend described at bug 583430)
aren't we going with V1 for old format and V2 for new format?
(In reply to comment #2) > aren't we going with V1 for old format and V2 for new format? We wanted to but VDSM said that the old format must be 0 because that is the way it is deployed in the field. Can we use 0 and 2 so we'll have in the backend V1==0 V2==2 and from now on we'll keep it in sync?
Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as exception or blocker. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Patches in gerrit: http://gerrit.usersys.redhat.com/253
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1782.html