Bug 691344 - vgabios is missing DPMS support (for S3 support for Win guests)
Summary: vgabios is missing DPMS support (for S3 support for Win guests)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: vgabios
Version: 6.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: All
urgent
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Gleb Natapov
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 691300 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-28 10:02 UTC by Gleb Natapov
Modified: 2013-12-09 00:53 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: vgabios-0.6b-3.6.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
This field is the basis of the errata or release note for this bug. It can also be used for change logs. The Technical Note template, known as CCFR, is as follows: Cause What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present. Consequence What happens when the bug presents. Fix What was done to fix the bug. Result What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur. Note: this is not the same as the bug doesn’t present anymore.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 14:28:19 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0776 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE vgabios bug fix update 2011-05-18 18:08:27 UTC

Description Gleb Natapov 2011-03-28 10:02:06 UTC 
For some reason rhel6 vgabios is based on 0.6b, but that latest one and the one in rhel5 are 0.6c.
Comment 4 Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-01 10:01:37 UTC 
Win2k3-32, win2k3-64, winxp passed whql "Sleep Stress with IO" now.
But checked the dtm log, found xp and 2k3-32 did both S3 and S4 state.
But 2k3-64 only did S4.
And we ran win7-32-nic "NDISTest6.5 (Wol and PM)", it failed as can not do
S3. For this failure, we can use erratum 831 to filter it, right?
Comment 13 Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-15 07:35:38 UTC 
Verified this issue with vgabios-0.6b-3.6.el6, passed for all 8 guests.
The steps and results are the same as Comment 5.
As Gleb confirmed on Comment 6 that they are all expected results.
So, This bug is verified pass.
Comment 15 Miya Chen 2011-04-20 06:16:47 UTC 
move it to verified based on comment#13 and comment#14
Comment 17 Florian Nadge 2011-04-20 13:32:47 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
This field is the basis of the errata or release note for this bug. It can also be used for change logs.

The Technical Note template, known as CCFR, is as follows:

Cause
    What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present.
Consequence
    What happens when the bug presents.
Fix
    What was done to fix the bug.
Result
    What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur.
    Note: this is not the same as the bug doesn’t present anymore.
Comment 22 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 14:28:19 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0776.html
Comment 23 Gleb Natapov 2011-05-30 15:12:28 UTC 
*** Bug 691300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.