RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 691887 - ValueError: Cannot remove extended partition sda4. Logical partitions present.
Summary: ValueError: Cannot remove extended partition sda4. Logical partitions present.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: anaconda
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: David Lehman
QA Contact: Release Test Team
URL:
Whiteboard: anaconda_trace_hash:d5dc145d12481ebdd...
: 691950 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 705163
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-29 19:33 UTC by Red Hat Case Diagnostics
Modified: 2018-11-14 15:09 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-08-15 18:13:28 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (402.07 KB, text/plain)
2011-03-29 19:34 UTC, Red Hat Case Diagnostics
no flags Details
anaconda's crash information (414.78 KB, text/plain)
2011-03-30 15:01 UTC, IBM Bug Proxy
no flags Details
sosreport from ls-b110 (405.27 KB, application/x-xz)
2011-03-30 15:01 UTC, IBM Bug Proxy
no flags Details

Description Red Hat Case Diagnostics 2011-03-29 19:33:54 UTC
The following was filed automatically by anaconda:
anaconda 13.21.82 exception report
Traceback (most recent call first):
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/devicetree.py", line 755, in _removeDevice
    "Logical partitions present." % dev.name)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/devicetree.py", line 800, in registerAction
    self._removeDevice(action.device)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/__init__.py", line 796, in destroyDevice
    self.devicetree.registerAction(action)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/partitioning.py", line 900, in doPartitioning
    storage.destroyDevice(part)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/iw/partition_gui.py", line 1584, in refresh
    doPartitioning(self.storage)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/iw/partition_gui.py", line 1323, in deleteCB
    self.refresh(justRedraw=justRedraw)
ValueError: Cannot remove extended partition sda4.  Logical partitions present.

Comment 1 Red Hat Case Diagnostics 2011-03-29 19:34:23 UTC
Created attachment 488537 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 4 Chris Lumens 2011-03-30 14:47:38 UTC
*** Bug 691950 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 IBM Bug Proxy 2011-03-30 15:01:51 UTC
Created attachment 488786 [details]
anaconda's crash information

Comment 6 IBM Bug Proxy 2011-03-30 15:01:57 UTC
Created attachment 488787 [details]
sosreport from ls-b110

Comment 8 IBM Bug Proxy 2011-07-08 06:40:47 UTC
------- Comment From vahegde1.ibm.com 2011-07-08 02:36 EDT-------
Hello Red Hat,

Its been some time we have not heard anything on this bug. Trying to understand the status of this issue. Can you please provide the update ?

Thanks
Vasant

Comment 9 David Lehman 2011-07-08 15:55:38 UTC
Can you provide a procedure I can use to reproduce this failure?

Comment 10 David Cantrell 2011-08-15 18:13:28 UTC
No information received.  If you are able to provide the information requested in comment #9, feel free to reopen the bug.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.