RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 692211 - Replication agreements contain attributes which have invalid syntax
Summary: Replication agreements contain attributes which have invalid syntax
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 7.3
Assignee: Noriko Hosoi
QA Contact: Viktor Ashirov
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 389_1.3.0 690319
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-30 17:35 UTC by Noriko Hosoi
Modified: 2020-09-13 19:48 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-31 21:20:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github 389ds 389-ds-base issues 58 0 None None None 2020-09-13 19:48:48 UTC

Description Noriko Hosoi 2011-03-30 17:35:19 UTC 
Reported by Andrey Ivanov (andrey.ivanov)

Description of problem:
However, i still have the syntax validation problem in cn=config for
replication agreements (have not tested with 1.2.8rcx but i think it has not
changed):

nsds5replicaChangesSentSinceStartup: value #0 invalid per syntax
nsds5replicaLastInitStart: value #0 invalid per syntax
nsds5replicaLastInitEnd: value #0 invalid per syntax

I think it's not the dn parsing problem, it is the schema definitions of
syntaxes for these attributes and the values that do not correspond to the
syntax :

(has integer syntax)nsds5replicaChangesSentSinceStartup: 1:11157/0 3:176/0
(has generalized time syntax)nsds5replicaLastInitStart: 0
(has generalized time syntax)nsds5replicaLastInitEnd: 0


attributeTypes: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.687 NAME
'nsds5replicaChangesSentSinceStartup' DESC 'Netscape defined attribute type'
EQUALITY integerMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 SINGLE-VALUE
NO-USER-MODIFICATION X-ORIGIN 'Netscape Directory Server' )

attributeTypes: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.807 NAME 'nsds5replicaLastInitStart'
DESC 'Netscape defined attribute type' EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch ORDERING
generalizedTimeOrderingMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24 SINGLE-VALUE
NO-USER-MODIFICATION X-ORIGIN 'Netscape Directory Server' )

attributeTypes: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.808 NAME 'nsds5replicaLastInitEnd' DESC
'Netscape defined attribute type' EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch ORDERING
generalizedTimeOrderingMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24 SINGLE-VALUE
NO-USER-MODIFICATION X-ORIGIN 'Netscape Directory Server' )

Note: Separated from Bug 555577 - Syntax validation fails for "ou=NetscapeRoot" tree
Comment 1 Martin Kosek 2012-01-04 13:27:21 UTC 
Upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/58
Comment 5 Nathan Kinder 2017-08-31 21:20:26 UTC 
There have been several bugs to resolve specific issues with validation since this bug was filed.  We believe the current versions to be fine in this regard.  Closing as CURRENTRELEASE.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.