RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 694881 - Please add policy for corosync-notifyd (runs as initrc_t)
Summary: Please add policy for corosync-notifyd (runs as initrc_t)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 6.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Grepl
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 832330
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-04-08 17:51 UTC by Jaroslav Kortus
Modified: 2014-06-17 14:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.7.19-106.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 10:07:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1511 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 00:39:17 UTC

Description Jaroslav Kortus 2011-04-08 17:51:25 UTC
Description of problem:
corosync-notifyd does not have it's own policy and keeps initrc_t after startup

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-3.7.19-82.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1.service corosync-notifyd start
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
initrc_t context

Expected results:
corosync-notifyd's own context

Additional info:
This is needed together with foghorn policy (bug 693792) to have full selinux coverage of added cluster SNMP functionality.

Comment 1 Daniel Walsh 2011-04-08 18:14:13 UTC
If this is not causing any AVC's I believe we should put this off until 6.2

Comment 2 Miroslav Grepl 2011-04-11 07:17:09 UTC
Jaroslav,
I am not seeing AVC msgs, can you confirm it with your configuration?


You could also try to play with the following labeling

chcon -t corosync_exec_t /usr/sbin/corosync-notifyd


which I believe it could also work.

Comment 3 Jaroslav Kortus 2011-04-11 09:23:54 UTC
I've not noticed any denial (yet), but that's IMHO not surprising in initrc_t context.

Comment 4 Miroslav Grepl 2011-04-11 10:27:33 UTC
Well, actually there could be AVC msgs. Other cluster domains could talk with this daemon which could cause issues.

Comment 8 Miroslav Grepl 2011-06-29 13:55:57 UTC
Fixed in selinux-policy-3.7.19-101.el6

Comment 11 Miroslav Grepl 2011-08-02 06:35:56 UTC
Fixed in selinux-policy-3.7.19-106.el6

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 10:07:29 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1511.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.