Hide Forgot
I'd like to request the addition of the FedFS schema described in this draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-protocol-11 as part of the repertoire of schemas that are installed by default for new servers. An overview of FedFS can be found here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5716 Can this be added in the upstream OpenLDAP distribution as well?
Equivalent request for 389-ds: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694652
I've posted an LDIF containing the FedFS NSDB schema in draft 11 here: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/fedfs-utils/dist/files/91fedfs.ldif This contains the correct IETF boilerplate. The schema is extracted verbatim from draft 11. I believe the NSDB protocol draft is in last call, so we don't expect any significant changes to this schema. My (weak) preference is that this file be added verbatim to the Fedora openldap package as installed, and hopefully upstream as well.
Hi Chuck, I suggest creating upstream issue on http://www.openldap.org/its/. If the schema is included upstream (at least into VCS), I will add it into Fedora as well. But I do not want to include any schema without upstream acceptance. If you need some help with creating the request, feel free to ask me. I can do it. And, please, post upstream issue number to this bugzilla. So I can track the progress. Thank you. Jan
(In reply to comment #3) > I suggest creating upstream issue on http://www.openldap.org/its/. If the > schema is included upstream (at least into VCS), I will add it into Fedora as > well. But I do not want to include any schema without upstream acceptance. > > If you need some help with creating the request, feel free to ask me. I can do > it. And, please, post upstream issue number to this bugzilla. So I can track > the progress. I'm happy to let you open a request on www.openldap.org/its, and I can add detail there if needed. I understand that this is a pre-requisite for FedFS schema support in Fedora's version of OpenLDAP.
This has to be resolved upstream.
(In reply to comment #5) > This has to be resolved upstream. Did I misunderstand what you meant by "help you create the request" ? I thought Red Hat could and would make the necessary upstream request.
(In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > This has to be resolved upstream. > > Did I misunderstand what you meant by "help you create the request" ? I > thought Red Hat could and would make the necessary upstream request. For openldap, please open an ITS in the openldap issue tracking system: http://www.openldap.org/its/
(In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > This has to be resolved upstream. > > > > Did I misunderstand what you meant by "help you create the request" ? I > > thought Red Hat could and would make the necessary upstream request. > > For openldap, please open an ITS in the openldap issue tracking system: > http://www.openldap.org/its/ (ITS#7246)