Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search.spec SRPM URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search-0.9.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Torrent Search looks for torrent files on different websites, and allows the user to filter the results, making it very easy to find the torrent you want. rpmlint output: #rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/torrent-search-0.9.2-1.fc14.noarch.rpm torrent-search.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary torrent-search-gnomeapplet 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Just some quick comments on your spec file: - You are mixing macro and variable style https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS - There is stuff for zsh. Wouldn't it be a good idea to put this in a subpackage? - There is an empty %doc line. The html docs can go there. - There is a missing BR for the locale files https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
Thanks for suggestions, Here is updated spec and srpm urls Spec URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search.spec SRPM URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search-0.9.2-2.fc14.src.rpm
Koji build failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2994517 See also rpmlint output: [fab@laptop023 SRPMS]$ rpmlint torrent-search-0.9.2-2.fc14.src.rpm torrent-search.src:47: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/bonobo/servers/TorrentSearch_Applet.server 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
(In reply to comment #1) > - There is stuff for zsh. Wouldn't it be a good idea to put this in a > subpackage? Put the zsh stuff in zsh subpackage of torrent-search. - torrent-search is a gui application but rpmbuild is not picking up. The website claims that GTK is needed for the gui. - Consider to remove the shebangs of the files in the %prep section instead of chmod in the %install section.
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - There is stuff for zsh. Wouldn't it be a good idea to put this in a > > subpackage? > > Put the zsh stuff in zsh subpackage of torrent-search. Done > - torrent-search is a gui application but rpmbuild is not picking up. The > website claims that GTK is needed for the gui. Done > - Consider to remove the shebangs of the files in the %prep section instead of > chmod in the %install section. Here do you mean only python files which are in install section? Can you please tell me if the package is noarch then what macro should i use instead of %{_libdir} ?
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > - Consider to remove the shebangs of the files in the %prep section instead of > > chmod in the %install section. > Here do you mean only python files which are in install section? Well, as far as I can see those python files are not called directly. So the shebang is not needed. The other files have some wired permission. What I tried to say was that file modification should be done in the %prep section. Please report the permission issue upstream. > Can you please tell me if the package is noarch then what macro should i use > instead of %{_libdir} ? Something like (untested)... %if "%{_lib}" == "lib64" mv %{buildroot}%{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers/TorrentSearch_Applet.server \ %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/bonobo/servers/TorrentSearch_Applet.server %endif ...could to the work, but I'm not sure if that's permitted.
(In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > - Consider to remove the shebangs of the files in the %prep section instead of > > > chmod in the %install section. > > Here do you mean only python files which are in install section? > > Well, as far as I can see those python files are not called directly. So the > shebang is not needed. The other files have some wired permission. > What I tried to say was that file modification should be done in the %prep > section. > > Please report the permission issue upstream. Reported to upstream waiting for reply.
Seeing "Bonobo" and "GNOME Applet" here makes me ask: How does torrent-search behaves in Fedora 15 with GNOME Shell?
torrent-search_0.9.2.3 is out, update the spec file, please.
Also noted I don't see icon in Menu->Internet->Torrent Search, seems like a problem with desktop file.
Thanks for reminding, I will do it with-in 2-3 days.
Updated Spec and SRPM here SPEC : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search.spec SRPM : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search-0.9.2.3-3.fc15.src.rpm Koji Output : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3071949
Please read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes [ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership ]
(In reply to comment #13) > Please read: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes > > [ > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > ] Thanks for suggestion. SPEC : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search.spec SRPM : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search-0.9.2.3-4.fc15.src.rpm Koji Build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3074312
The latest release is 0.11.2.
Updated SPEC : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search.spec SRPM : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search-0.11.2-1.fc16.src.rpm Koji Build :http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3876783 I no longer use torrent-search so if someone want to take over it, please go ahead.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process | | Wait for someone to review your package! At this point in the process, | the fedora-review flag is blank, meaning that no reviewer is assigned. An incorrectly/mistakably set fedora-review flag causes the ticket to be listed as being worked on by somebody.