php-fpm (and probably php-cgi) need /var/lib/php/session which is owned by php Proposal : move session dir to php-common. This will imply to create "apache" user in %pre to avoid dependency on httpd.
Is it necessary for fpm to run children as the "apache" user? I would have thought it would be a good idea to run them as under a separate uid.
(In reply to comment #1) > Is it necessary for fpm to run children as the "apache" user? I would have > thought it would be a good idea to run them as under a separate uid. I'm sorry you seems to have miss my request for comment on this http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/php-devel/2010-July/thread.html Running the default php-fpm service as apache allow webapps, which give rights on apache to some dir, to work "out-of-the-box" with php-fpm (even, in if fact, apache + php-fpm will works fine with httpd 2.4 (mod_proxy_fcgi) and php 5.3.7) A better solution is probably to give right to a generic "webserver" group (AFAIK, debian use www-data), which solves issue for other web server (lighttpd, nginx, ...). But this is probably a "feature" for a major fedora version. Of course, using a phpfpm user, and a /var/lib/php-fpm/session is a solution for this folder, but not for others, used by web applications (upload dir, ...).
Also, cherokee can use php-fpm and, by default, it uses /etc/php-fpm.d/www.conf (In reply to comment #2) > A better solution is probably to give right to a generic "webserver" group > (AFAIK, debian use www-data), which solves issue for other web server > (lighttpd, nginx, ...). But this is probably a "feature" for a major fedora > version. I really like this proposal; since it would solve this other Bug 680056
This message is a notice that Fedora 15 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 15. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At this time, all open bugs with a Fedora 'version' of '15' have been closed as WONTFIX. (Please note: Our normal process is to give advanced warning of this occurring, but we forgot to do that. A thousand apologies.) Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, feel free to reopen this bug and simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were unable to fix it before Fedora 15 reached end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on "Clone This Bug" (top right of this page) and open it against that version of Fedora. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping