Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/aspell-pt_PT.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/aspell-pt_PT-20070510-1.fc13.src.rpm The upstream of Portuguese dictionary split the dictionary to two parts this bug is for the European Portuguese part.
rpmlint output: aspell-pt_TP.src:27: W: configure-without-libdir-spec It has custom ./configure script, not autoconf. aspell-pt_PT.x86_64: E: no-binary aspell-pt_PT.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Both are caused by aspell design, it's data files are architecture dependent and these reports seem to be common to all aspell language packages. All MUST/SHOULD package review items are ok, .spec file looks sane (apart from Epoch:50, which is another aspell oddity). %description should end with dot, not with comma, so please fix it before pushing to git. I don't want to stop review just because of this cosmetic stuff. So I approve the package.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: aspell-pt_PT Short Description: European Portuguese dictionaries for Aspell Owners: varekova Branches: InitialCC:
Same here... Next time, please fix your Review Summary. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request You also made a SCM Request with no branches.
An SCM request without branches is perfectly valid (as the devel branch is created implicitly). However, we won't process requests where the ticket summary is not in the proper format (as we use that as a guard against creating the wrong package name due to typos). So, please fix the summary and I'll process the SCM request.
Git done (by process-git-requests). no branchs is valid you get devel only
You can also remove BuildRoot tag [1] and %clean section [2]. [1] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag [2] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
Thanks, fixed the dot after the description, removed BuildRoot tag and clean part.