Hide Forgot
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commitdiff;h=5e8176e1569de2469321f63aee1765e51bc5ded0
This prevents the occurrence of the temporary network interface names, when udev has to rename the network interfaces. Remember the "eth0-rename" or "eth0-eth1" temporary names?
Ah, I should add the following: These temporary names were not "unique" enough, but using the IFINDEX should be.
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: When udev renamed network interfaces and encountered a naming conflict, it renamed the interfaces to "<initial name>-<wanted name>". This name might also be not unique. So udev now uses the unique interface index for renaming and temporarily renamed interfaces now have the name "rename<ifindex>".
Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. Diffed Contents: @@ -1 +1 @@ -When udev renamed network interfaces and encountered a naming conflict, it renamed the interfaces to "<initial name>-<wanted name>". This name might also be not unique. So udev now uses the unique interface index for renaming and temporarily renamed interfaces now have the name "rename<ifindex>".+When udev renamed a network interface and encountered a naming conflict, it renamed the interface to "[initial name]-[desired name]". Sometimes, this name was not unique and the naming conflict persisted. This bug has been fixed, udev now uses the unique interface index for renaming, and temporary names for interfaces are now of the following format: "rename[ifindex]".
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1649.html