RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 701554 - userpasswd not replicating
Summary: userpasswd not replicating
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 6.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Rich Megginson
QA Contact: Chandrasekar Kannan
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 701057
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-05-03 08:28 UTC by RHEL Program Management
Modified: 2015-09-28 13:29 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.el6_1.1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Password changes did not replicate because the method used to pass the changes to slave nodes was rejected on the slave nodes. This issue has been corrected, and password changes now replicate as expected
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-23 18:42:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0824 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE 389-ds-base bug fix update 2011-05-23 18:42:22 UTC

Description RHEL Program Management 2011-05-03 08:28:02 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #701057 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.1 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 6 Amita Sharma 2011-05-04 10:08:03 UTC 
[root@rhel61-ds90-amita ~]# ldapmodify -x -h localhost -p 20100 -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w Secret123 << EOF
> dn: uid=amita,ou=people,dc=replsuffix,dc=com
> changetype: add
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: person
> objectClass: inetorgperson
> sn: testkrbuser
> cn: kkk testkrbuser
> userPassword: redhat
> EOF
adding new entry "uid=amita,ou=people,dc=replsuffix,dc=com"


At Master
===========
ldapsearch -h localhost -p 20100 -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w Secret123 -b "ou=people,dc=replsuffix,dc=com"
# amita, People, replsuffix.com
dn: uid=amita,ou=People,dc=replsuffix,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: person
objectClass: inetorgperson
objectClass: organizationalPerson
sn: testkrbuser
cn: kkk testkrbuser
uid: amita
userPassword:: e1NTSEF9YTVnQm5jN3UyUVo2Y1lkdTk1aHlsZkZwbHE1Q0dmYStYbko1Smc9PQ=
 =

At Slave
=============
ldapsearch -h localhost -p 20102 -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w Secret123 -b "ou=people,dc=replsuffix,dc=com"
# amita, People, replsuffix.com
dn: uid=amita,ou=People,dc=replsuffix,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: person
objectClass: inetorgperson
objectClass: organizationalPerson
sn: testkrbuser
cn: kkk testkrbuser
uid: amita
userPassword:: e1NTSEF9YTVnQm5jN3UyUVo2Y1lkdTk1aHlsZkZwbHE1Q0dmYStYbko1Smc9PQ=
 =

Changed the password at LUMA.

At Master
=========
# amita, People, replsuffix.com
dn: uid=amita,ou=People,dc=replsuffix,dc=com
userPassword:: e1NTSEF9bHZ6T3l0ZEtORTdDcXE0ZHNDSTRjL2VGRVRaM2s3WUFGL0xsRmc9PQ=
 =
objectClass: top
objectClass: person
objectClass: inetorgperson
objectClass: organizationalPerson
sn: testkrbuser
cn: kkk testkrbuser
uid: amita

At Slave
=========
dn: uid=amita,ou=People,dc=replsuffix,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: person
objectClass: inetorgperson
objectClass: organizationalPerson
sn: testkrbuser
cn: kkk testkrbuser
uid: amita
userPassword:: e1NTSEF9YTVnQm5jN3UyUVo2Y1lkdTk1aHlsZkZwbHE1Q0dmYStYbko1Smc9PQ=
 =

This is same as the bug reported. Am I missing anything?
Comment 7 Amita Sharma 2011-05-04 11:00:28 UTC 
Upgraded the new build from brew build and tested successfully.
Marking as VERIFIED.

At Master
----------
userPassword:: e1NTSEF9MmtJZlFHVWhhMS9KalVoSFB4TU1ZTENqb09RSmRuaytBRjl4T1E9PQ=

At Slave
-------------
userPassword:: e1NTSEF9MmtJZlFHVWhhMS9KalVoSFB4TU1ZTENqb09RSmRuaytBRjl4T1E9PQ=
Comment 8 Laura Bailey 2011-05-17 04:30:01 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Password changes did not replicate across clustered servers because the method used to pass the changes to slave nodes was rejected on the slave nodes. This issue has been corrected, and password changes now replicateas expected
Comment 9 Rich Megginson 2011-05-17 17:00:04 UTC 
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Password changes did not replicate across clustered servers because the method used to pass the changes to slave nodes was rejected on the slave nodes. This issue has been corrected, and password changes now replicateas expected+Password changes did not replicate because the method used to pass the changes to slave nodes was rejected on the slave nodes. This issue has been corrected, and password changes now replicate as expected
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-23 18:42:29 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0824.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.