Bug 70305 - comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm fails to build on second Limbo beta
comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm fails to build on second Limbo beta
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: comps (Show other bugs)
limbo
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tim Powers
Brock Organ
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2002-07-31 11:43 EDT by Glen A. Foster
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:44 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-07-31 11:44:02 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Glen A. Foster 2002-07-31 11:43:58 EDT
Description of Problem: SSIA.  Performing a re-build of comps from the SRPM
fails on an everything install of Limbo (round 2).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# ls -l comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2445 Jul 26 11:44
comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm
# md5sum comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm
c9ad885fbd4b3ef3a825969c1fb88f05  comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm

How Reproducible: always (100%)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Limbo, second beta, "everything" install
2. rpm -Uvh {distdir}/SRPMS/comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm
3. rpm -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/comps.spec

Actual Results:
Out of "rpm -ba" is attached

Expected Results:
Successful build

Additional information:
[ Output of rpmbuild -ba ]
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.13674
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ '[' -d '%{basedir}' ']'
+ echo 'This specfile needs access to %{basedir}'
This specfile needs access to %{basedir}
+ exit 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.13674 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.13674 (%prep)
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2002-07-31 12:12:00 EDT
Yes, you have to pass defines to this package for it to rebuild otherwise it
can't  find the location of the bits it's packaging up.
Comment 2 Glen A. Foster 2002-07-31 14:02:12 EDT
Hokey-dokey.  What magic arguments must one supply to rpmbuild so that this SRPM
can be re-built without errors?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.