Bug 70305 - comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm fails to build on second Limbo beta
Summary: comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm fails to build on second Limbo beta
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: comps
Version: limbo
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tim Powers
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-07-31 15:43 UTC by Glen A. Foster
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-07-31 15:44:02 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Glen A. Foster 2002-07-31 15:43:58 UTC
Description of Problem: SSIA.  Performing a re-build of comps from the SRPM
fails on an everything install of Limbo (round 2).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# ls -l comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2445 Jul 26 11:44
comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm
# md5sum comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm
c9ad885fbd4b3ef3a825969c1fb88f05  comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm

How Reproducible: always (100%)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Limbo, second beta, "everything" install
2. rpm -Uvh {distdir}/SRPMS/comps-7.3.93-0.20020726.src.rpm
3. rpm -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/comps.spec

Actual Results:
Out of "rpm -ba" is attached

Expected Results:
Successful build

Additional information:
[ Output of rpmbuild -ba ]
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.13674
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ '[' -d '%{basedir}' ']'
+ echo 'This specfile needs access to %{basedir}'
This specfile needs access to %{basedir}
+ exit 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.13674 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.13674 (%prep)

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2002-07-31 16:12:00 UTC
Yes, you have to pass defines to this package for it to rebuild otherwise it
can't  find the location of the bits it's packaging up.

Comment 2 Glen A. Foster 2002-07-31 18:02:12 UTC
Hokey-dokey.  What magic arguments must one supply to rpmbuild so that this SRPM
can be re-built without errors?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.