Bug 703698 - Review Request: gx_head - a mono tube amplifier (guitarix branch)
Summary: Review Request: gx_head - a mono tube amplifier (guitarix branch)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: 15
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Orcan Ogetbil
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-05-11 04:28 UTC by Brendan Jones
Modified: 2012-08-07 20:26 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-07 20:26:21 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
oget.fedora: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Brendan Jones 2011-05-11 04:28:04 UTC
gx_head is a simple guitar mono tube amplifier simulation based
on the work done in the Guitarix project (same developers) and is under heavy development.

SPEC:
http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/gx_head.spec

SRPM:
http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/gx_head-0.14.0-1.fc15.src.rpm

fedora15:~$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gx_head-0.14.0-1.fc15.src.rpm 
gx_head.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gx -> g, x, ex
gx_head.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tonestack -> tone stack, tone-stack, tones tack
gx_head.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autowah -> autobahn
gx_head.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US phaser -> phase, phrase, phases
gx_head.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US flanger -> flange, flanges, clanger
gx_head.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore, pee
gx_head.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US guitarix -> guitar ix, guitar-ix, guitarist
gx_head.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US funkmuscle -> funk muscle, funk-muscle, musclebound
gx_head.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zettberlin -> timberline
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.

Comment 1 Orcan Ogetbil 2011-06-01 02:09:20 UTC
Hi Brendan, here is my review:

! %description may need some implevement, such as 
   witch -> which
   could be load -> could be loaded
   could connected -> could be connected
   etc

? There are a bunch of files that get installed in /usr/share/gx_head/sounds/ and they have 664 permissions instead of the standard 644. Search for the string "664" in the wscript file. I don't think that this is a blocker but do you know if there is a reason for this? 

! In addition to the above rpmlints, which can be ignored, I got the following:
   gx_head.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gx_head
      ignore this one
   gx_head.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/gx_head.mo
   gx_head.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/gx_head.mo
   gx_head.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/gx_head.mo
      This is a blocker. We install locales in a special way. See below.
   some 100+ "incorrect-fsf-address" warnings
      There was a discussion in the devel list a few days ago. Folks said it would be good to notify the upstream about this issue.

* The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Please see
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files

Comment 2 Brendan Jones 2011-06-01 10:03:26 UTC
Thanks Orcan - have fixed (and shortened) the sloppy description and the other issues. I will inform upstream about the FSF address change.

SPEC:
http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/gx_head.spec

SRPM:
http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/gx_head-0.14.0-2.fc15.src.rpm

Comment 3 Orcan Ogetbil 2011-06-03 02:55:06 UTC
Thanks. The general convention is to try to fix simple issues in %prep as long as they are easy; for instance you can fix the chmod 644 issue in the wscript file via patch or sed. 

Otherwise the package looks good.

------------------------------------------
This package (gx_head) is APPROVED by oget
------------------------------------------

Comment 4 Brendan Jones 2011-06-04 22:39:07 UTC
Thanks Orcan - I will move into a patch before updating.

Comment 5 Brendan Jones 2011-06-04 22:44:02 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: gx_head
Short Description: Mono tube amplifier to JACK
Owners: bsjones
Branches: f14 f15
InitialCC:

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2011-06-05 22:32:25 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 00:18:50 UTC
gx_head-0.14.0-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gx_head-0.14.0-3.fc15

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 00:18:58 UTC
gx_head-0.14.0-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gx_head-0.14.0-3.fc14

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2011-06-08 23:59:20 UTC
gx_head-0.14.0-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.

Comment 10 Fedora End Of Life 2012-08-07 20:26:23 UTC
This message is a notice that Fedora 15 is now at end of life. Fedora
has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 15. It is
Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no
longer maintained. At this time, all open bugs with a Fedora 'version'
of '15' have been closed as WONTFIX.

(Please note: Our normal process is to give advanced warning of this
occurring, but we forgot to do that. A thousand apologies.)

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, feel free to reopen
this bug and simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that
we were unable to fix it before Fedora 15 reached end of life. If you
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it
against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on
"Clone This Bug" (top right of this page) and open it against that
version of Fedora.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.