Bug 703896 - fop & jeuclid-fop don't appear to support MathML
Summary: fop & jeuclid-fop don't appear to support MathML
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: jeuclid
Version: 14
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Brennan Ashton
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-05-11 15:05 UTC by Stefan Seefeld
Modified: 2012-08-16 21:24 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-16 21:24:43 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
test input (FO). (539 bytes, application/xml)
2011-05-11 16:43 UTC, Stefan Seefeld
no flags Details

Description Stefan Seefeld 2011-05-11 15:05:00 UTC
Description of problem:

I'd like to process xsl-fo including embedded mathml into pdf.
fop reports errors (warnings) on "unknown formatting objects", despite me having installed the jeuclid-fo package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

fop 0.95-5.fc14
jeuclid-fop 3.1.3-12.fc12

How reproducible:

Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Write an arbitrary FO file including MathML (such as generated when authoring DocBook with MathML.
2. invoke fop to generate pdf.
  
Actual results:

fop will issue warnings about "Unknown formatting object http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML^math" etc.
The generated pdf won't contain the expected math expressions (but instead only whitespace at those spots).

Expected results:

Correct pdf.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Brennan Ashton 2011-05-11 16:24:28 UTC
It looks like there were some changes made to FOP, I will update, test and rebuild for the new version in the next couple days. If you could attach a sample FO file that fails that would be great.

Comment 2 Stefan Seefeld 2011-05-11 16:43:09 UTC
Created attachment 498337 [details]
test input (FO).

Brennan,

thanks for the very speedy follow-up.
Here is a test file demonstrating the behavior I described.
I tested with `fop test.fo test.pdf`

Thanks,
     Stefan

Comment 3 Stefan Seefeld 2011-05-20 14:14:07 UTC
Brennan,

the upcoming Fedora 15  release will (AFAIU) contain fop 1.0. Will the fixed jeuclid-fop work with that version, too ? 

Thanks,
      Stefan

Comment 4 Brennan Ashton 2011-05-24 19:45:33 UTC
It should work with it although I may need to do a couple patches as it is tightly connected to FOP 0.95 With Fedora 15 out today I will try to get on this. I have been unexpectedly out of town the last few weeks.

Comment 5 Stefan Seefeld 2011-05-25 20:32:27 UTC
OK, great, I'm looking forward to it (as I have just upgraded to Fedora 15).

Comment 6 Brennan Ashton 2011-06-01 04:28:29 UTC
There are some java issues with the new version, and the patches that Debian is using are not all that clean. Still working on it though.

Comment 7 Stefan Seefeld 2011-09-25 13:49:24 UTC
Any news on this ? Fedora 15 is now using fop-1.0. Will jeuclid-fop support this anytime soon ?

Thanks,

Comment 8 Stefan Seefeld 2011-11-16 00:14:13 UTC
Ping ? (I have just upgraded to Fedora 16 and things are still not working. :-( )

Current versions:

fop-1.0-17
jeuclid-fop-3.1.3-14


Thanks,
       Stefan

Comment 9 Fedora End Of Life 2012-08-16 21:24:45 UTC
This message is a notice that Fedora 14 is now at end of life. Fedora 
has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 14. It is 
Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no 
longer maintained.  At this time, all open bugs with a Fedora 'version'
of '14' have been closed as WONTFIX.

(Please note: Our normal process is to give advanced warning of this 
occurring, but we forgot to do that. A thousand apologies.)

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, feel free to reopen 
this bug and simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we were unable to fix it before Fedora 14 reached end of life. If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on 
"Clone This Bug" (top right of this page) and open it against that 
version of Fedora.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.